Composition Proficiency
Rubric
|
RUBRIC |
4:
exceeds standard |
3:
meets standard |
2:
approaching standard |
1:
standard not demonstrated |
|
Critical Thinking: Written |
Identifies Rule of Thirds and
more than two basic shots by clearly describing with concrete detail how a TV
scene met the criteria. |
Identifies Rule of Thirds and
at least two basic shots by clearly describing with concrete detail how a TV
scene met the criteria. |
Attempts to identify the Rule
of Thirds and at least two basic shots but does not clearly describe how a TV
scene met the criteria. |
Attempts to identify the Rule
of Thirds and at least two basic shots but does not provide any explanation
of how the TV scene met the criteria. |
|
Communication: Written |
For each of the three examples,
student explains with insight and detail why she believes that composition
was chosen and what its intended purpose was based on composition guidelines. |
For each of the three examples,
student explains why she believes that composition was chosen and what its
intended purpose was based on composition guidelines. |
For each of the three examples,
student explains why she believes that composition was chosen but it is based
on composition guidelines. |
For each of the three examples,
student fails to explain why she believes that composition was chosen. |
|
Critical Thinking: Shot List |
Tells a story by the
appropriate use of all basic shots as well as the Rule of Thirds, or its violation,
in 4-8 slides. |
Tells a story by the
appropriate use of ELS/LS, CU, MS and the Rule of Thirds in 4-8 slides. |
Attempts to tell a story by
using of ELS/LS, CU, MS and the Rule of Thirds in 4-8 slides, but the basic
shots are not appropriate for the purpose intended. |
Attempts to tell a story by
using basic shots and the Rule of Thirds, but does not use the required shots
or does not meet the shot number requirements. |